TAKE ACTION: Please Complete the Lower Snake River Dam Survey

TAKE ACTION: Please Complete the Lower Snake River Dam Survey

As a part of Washington’s Lower Snake River Dams (LSRD) Stakeholder Process, an extensive survey on the public’s perception of retaining or breaching/removing the four dams has been posted.

Every wild steelhead and salmon advocate should take this important opportunity to have their voice heard. Again and again we have seen documentation of the terrible effects these dams have on the salmon and steelhead of the Snake River basin. We are especially aware of these long-term declines this year because the Clearwater River, and portions of the Snake River, were closed to steelhead fishing due to dismal fish returns.

(See Steve Pettit’s grim chart of 2019 steelhead returns at Lower Granite Dam.)

Complete the Survey here:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/lsrdsurvey

WDFW News Release

Important update!

Read the news release that came out today regarding Wild Steelhead gene banks:

WDFW NEWS RELEASE
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
600 Capitol Way North, Olympia, WA 98501-1091
http://wdfw.wa.gov/

March 10, 2014
Contact: Cindy Le Fleur, (360) 696-6211

Three tributaries of Columbia River
designated wild steelhead gene banks

OLYMPIA – The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) today designated three tributaries of the lower Columbia River as “wild steelhead gene banks,” where it will no longer release steelhead raised in fish hatcheries.

Starting this year, WDFW will no longer plant hatchery steelhead in the East Fork Lewis River or the North Fork Toutle/Green River. The Wind River, which has not been stocked with steelhead since 1997, will also be off-limits to any future releases.

As part of that plan, WDFW will redirect more than 50,000 hatchery smolts previously slated for the East Fork Lewis River into the Washougal River and Salmon Creek, and is working to place another 25,000 smolts previously earmarked for the North Fork Toutle/Green River.

Director Phil Anderson said those actions are part of a statewide effort to help conserve and restore wild steelhead, particularly those listed for protection under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA). All three watersheds designated as gene banks today support wild steelhead listed as threatened since 1998.

“We are building a future where wild steelhead – our state fish – can be enjoyed as part of the natural heritage of our state,” Anderson said. “We will continue to support fisheries with hatchery production in selected areas of southwest Washington, while ensuring that wild fish can be given the best opportunity possible to rebuild and flourish in the future.”

Studies have shown that hatchery fish can compete with wild steelhead for spawning partners, and that interbreeding can reduce survival rates for wild steelhead, Anderson said.

WDFW first identified wild steelhead gene banks as a recovery strategy in the Statewide Steelhead Management Plan, adopted by the Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission in 2008. The department designated the Sol Duc River on the Olympic Peninsula as the state’s first official wild steelhead gene bank in 2012.

Cindy LeFleur, WDFW regional fish manager, said the department’s selection of the three gene banks in the lower Columbia River Basin was based on criteria outlined in the statewide plan and public input received over the past two years. Three local advisory groups appointed by WDFW issued recommendations for specific areas, drawing hundreds of public comments – pro and con – at public meetings and in messages to the department.

“A key requirement for wild steelhead gene banks is that they have a self-sustaining wild steelhead population,” LeFleur said. “The goal is to protect those primary populations and allow them to propagate with minimal interference from hatchery fish.”

To support that effort, WDFW plans to open fishing seasons in the new wild steelhead zones targeting hatchery fish, which will continue to return to those rivers for at least two more years, LeFleur said. Catch-and-release fishing for wild steelhead may also be allowed in later years.

Meanwhile, WDFW will continue to support fishing opportunities in other local rivers, LeFleur said. Those rivers include the mainstem Toutle, South Fork Toutle, Cowlitz, Kalama, Salmon, Washougal, and mainstem and North Fork Lewis rivers.

Jim Scott, assistant director of WDFW’s Fish Program, said the department will forward its final decisions on the gene banks to NOAA-Fisheries, the federal agency that oversees salmon and steelhead recovery in southwest Washington.

“NOAA-Fisheries has strongly supported our efforts to create these new wild steelhead zones, and we’ve communicated frequently throughout the process,” he said.

Scott noted that WDFW plans to create more wild steelhead gene banks throughout the state in the years ahead.

“During the next six months, we will be focusing on establishing wild steelhead gene banks for Puget Sound and lower Columbia tributaries below the Cowlitz River,” Scott said. “As with the plan announced today, our goal will be to continue to make those fish available for area fisheries where doing so is consistent with our steelhead conservation goals.”

http://wdfw.wa.gov/

Support the SWCC – March 3-7th

Starting on March 3rd and through the 7th, there is going to be an online auction to benefit the Skeena Watershed Conservation Coalition.

Bid on items and know your investment will spawn into keeping the SWCC initiatives working at preserving the recreational resource and the wild rivers, you so love to be a part of.  You can help save fish by getting yourself into some new waders, outfit your wallet with news flies or make that cast across the glassy water vintage style with a bamboo fly-rod or Henshaw Reel.  So get bidding, and get your buddies bidding so you can outbid them!

For more info and to see items that will be available for bidding, see link below:

http://www.biddingowl.com/Auction/home.cfm?auctionID=991

Pebble Mine Response from Senator Cantwell

I received this email today regarding my letter to support efforts to stop the pebble mine in Alaska.

If you haven’t done so already, please show your support by going to:

http://takeaction.savebristolbay.org/savebristolbay/home/

 

 

 

Dear Mrs. Schweitzer,

Thank you for contacting me about the proposed Pebble Mine in Alaska. I appreciate hearing from you on this important matter and sincerely regret the delayed response.

As you know, the Pebble Mine is a massive mineral exploration project proposed for the Bristol Bay region in Alaska. Currently, this project is under consideration for development by Canadian-based Northern Dynasty Minerals, Ltd. According to the company review of the proposed mine site, fully mining the copper, gold, molybdenum, and other metals would produce over seven billion tons of waste rock, a toxic mix of arsenic and other chemicals that would be deposited in massive new artificial lakes. Seepage into the groundwater could adversely impact the Bristol Bay watershed, which is the main outflow for the rivers and streams in the proposed mine area. Contaminated water and industrial mining activities would threaten the pristine local environment and the diverse marine and terrestrial life that depend on it.

Of particular concern are the potential impacts to the wild and healthy salmon populations that thrive in the watershed. Bristol Bay is one of the most productive salmon runs in the world, generating a total value of $674 million each year in the Pacific Northwest and $1.5 billion in total value. Bristol Bay salmon support as many as 12,000 seasonal jobs and 6,000 full-time jobs in the Pacific Northwest. Thousands of Washington state jobs, including seafood processing and the restaurant and shipbuilding industry, depend on healthy, sustainable salmon populations.

I have been in regular contact with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), U.S. Securities and Exchanges Commission, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the Obama Administration regarding the mine’s potential impact to Washington state fishing jobs.

The EPA has the authority, under Section 404(c) of the Clean Water Act, to restrict, prohibit, deny, or withdraw the use of a water body as a disposal site for dredged or fill material – such as mining and other waste – if it determines the discharge will have unacceptable adverse impacts on municipal water supplies, shellfish beds and fishery areas, wildlife, or recreational areas.

When the EPA released its final draft of its Watershed Assessment on January 15, 2014, its scientific assessment was clear: the proposed Pebble Mine poses a direct threat to Bristol Bay salmon and the Pacific Northwest jobs that depend on them. The report specifically states that the mine would destroy up to 94 miles of salmon streams, and 1,300-5,350 acres of wetlands would be destroyed as a part of normal mining operations. Plus, the report details many more potential catastrophic impacts in the event of a mine failure.

 

That is why, on January 23, 2014, I sent a letter to President Obama urging him to use his authority under the Clean Water Act to prevent the construction of the Pebble Mine. I will continue to fight to protect Washington and Alaska fishing jobs, clean water and the way of life for Alaska Native populations. President Obama and the EPA need to use the authority under the Clean Water Act to protect Bristol Bay salmon, and the Northwest fishing economy that depends on them.

 

Over the past three years, I have worked hard to ensure science is used to determine future actions in Bristol Bay. That is why, I wrote to Administrator Jackson on September 12, 2011, to express my support for the EPA’s decision to conduct a thorough scientific analysis of the effect a large-scale development project would have on the Bristol Bay watershed. The EPA released a draft scientific study in May 2012 that found that the construction of the mine would result in the loss of dozens of miles of streams that are used for salmon spawning and thousands of acres of wetlands. Based on this study, I wrote again to Administrator Jackson on May 30, 2012, pressing the agency to take the study further, and incorporate economic data in the report. I asked specifically how the impact or loss of the sockeye salmon fishery would impact Washington State fishing jobs.

I also joined with four other senators, Patty Murray (D-WA), Jeff Merkley (D-OR), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), and Barbara Boxer (D-CA) in sending an additional letter to President Barack Obama on June 10, 2013, urging him to support the EPA and protect wild salmon and the commercial fishing industry in Washington and Alaska.

Throughout this process, I have felt it is important to give stakeholders in our region a chance to voice their concerns firsthand. To that end, on May 9, 2012, I wrote a letter to Administrator Jackson requesting an opportunity for our fishermen and other concerned parties to provide input at a public forum in Washington state. As a result, the EPA agreed, and held a public hearing in Seattle last year.

I have also noticed some contradictory information from the Canadian company proposing to construct the mine, Northern Dynasty Minerals. In February of 2011, the company submitted a report to the SEC called the “Wardrop Report.” The report was used by the EPA to calculate the potential impacts the mine would have on Bristol Bay Salmon in the Draft Watershed Assesment. In the report, the company told the SEC that the proposed mine design and specifications were both feasible and permittable. The company later testified before the EPA that the data from the report was a “fantasy proposal.” I sent a letter to the SEC on March 18, 2013, requesting that the agency investigate these discrepancies.

Thank you again for contacting me to share your thoughts on this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact me in the future if I can be of further assistance.

Sincerely,
Maria Cantwell
United States Senator

For future correspondence with my office, please visit my website at
http://cantwell.senate.gov/contact/

“Wild Reverence”

Shane Anderson and North Fork Studios have created a film that highlights the decline in our wild steelhead population today and what we can do to help the future of these magnificent fish. I can’t wait to see it in its entirety.

The video preview speaks for itself, and the fish:


The full length production is set to be released soon…

For more information visit: Wild Reverence

There are more and more groups getting involved with conservation projects that want to help save wild steelhead from depleting entirely. The only way they will have a chance at success, is to educate yourself and be a part of an organization that cares.

If you want to get involved and/or educated on the importance in conservation of wild steelhead, I recommend visiting the Wild Steelhead Coalition’s website: http://wildsteelheadcoalition.org/

Thank you.

I hope everyone is able to see Anderson’s film at some point or another…

What’s wrong with hatcheries?

Well, for one thing, they have a huge negative impact on wild fish populations. This is why when my husband and I catch a hatchery salmon or steelhead (you can tell by the adipose fin being clipped), if at all possible, we kill and eat it.

The WSC (Wild Steelhead Coalition) has provided useful information about why hatcheries do more harm than good for wild steelhead and salmon:

“The ecological impacts of hatcheries are also increasingly being highlighted as cause for concern for wild populations. Production hatcheries release several billion hatchery salmon and steelhead each year. These fish, often larger than their wild counterparts compete for finite resources with wild fish, prey upon wild juveniles, spread disease, and attract predators. Furthermore, many of these fish will remain in freshwater and wild fish in most systems are subject to competition and predation from residualized hatchery fish.”

Read the whole article Here

There is a lot that people can do to help, but the easiest way to do your part to help save wild populations of salmon and steelhead, is by educating yourself and getting involved with organizations that have already started the dirty work for you.

To name just a few organizations that are doing their best at conservation projects:

WSC

Trout Unlimited

Native Fish Society

Hoh River Trust

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

While we are on the topic of conservation, there is a big reason why I support clothing companies like Patagonia: THEY CARE.

“We can’t pose Patagonia as the model of a responsible company. We don’t do everything a responsible company can do, nor does anyone else we know. But we can tell you how we came to realize our environmental and social responsibilities, and then began to act on them. Like other things in human life, it began with one step that led to another.” -Yvon Chouinard and Vincent Stanley

Read about why the company that not only stands behind their quality, but also stands behind the environment that allows us to keep enjoying the outdoors: http://www.patagonia.com/us/environmentalism

Cheers~

-L.S.

The Hoh River Trust

My good friend, Pam Harris, shared this article with me that talks about a group that was formed, called the Hoh River Trust, to help protect the Hoh river and the wildlife that it inhabits.

Here is the part of the article that, to me, highlights the importance of why the group was formed:

“The Hoh River has been called “a last great American river.”

It is home to one of the healthiest native salmon and steelhead runs in the continental U.S., and famous for its huge trees and rain forests.

It remains untouched by dams, major river diversions or significant hatchery influence.

The Hoh River is one of the larger river systems on the Peninsula, with headwaters on Mount Olympus, then coursing almost 60 miles to the Pacific Ocean.

The first 30 miles and the mouth are protected within Olympic National Park.

And now the 26 miles outside the park are largely protected with conservation easements on state, federal and private lands as well as almost 7,000 acres owned by the Hoh River Trust.

The mission of the Hoh River Trust is to preserve and enhance lands forming a corridor along the river while maintaining public access for fishing, hunting, hiking and boating.” click here for the rest

 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Here has is the breakdown of what the Trust has done since it was established in 2004:

  • $12mm in Federal Grants for land acquisition
  • 6,800 acres under HRT ownership
  • $1mm in grants for restoration projects
  • 29 river miles protected
  • 9 fish barriers and blockages removed
  • 8 tributary miles opened for fish passage
  • 533 acres of forest lands in active restoration
  • 1.9 miles  of roads decommissioned
  • 1066 acres controlled per year for invasive plants 

Source: http://www.hohrivertrust.org

For more information on the Hoh River Trust and how you can get involved:
Click Here